PropScorer / Compare / FundedNext Futures vs Topstep
FundedNext Futures vs Topstep
90
FundedNext Futures
81
Topstep Compared on live data · as of Sep 22, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: FundedNext Futures leads by PropScore (90 vs 81). FundedNext Futures wins on Activation fee. Topstep wins on Entry price, Profit split, Drawdown. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
FundedNext Futures
Metric
Topstep
$299 · 50K
Entry price
$198 · 50K✓
80%
Profit split
90%✓
trailing
Drawdown
eod✓
✓$0
Activation fee
$149
n/a
Payout speed
1 days
n/a
Data feeds
TopstepX + Quantower✓
n/a
Max accounts
5
No
Move to live
After review payouts✓
n/a / n/a
Bots / micro-scalping
Not listed / Not listed✓
n/a
Health score
74
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you
Choose FundedNext Futures if…
- You prefer its edge on activation fee.
- You already know FundedNext Futures's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
- You already know FundedNext Futures's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
- You already know FundedNext Futures's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
Choose Topstep if…
- You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
- You want the stronger profit split in the current plan data.
- You prefer its edge on drawdown.
- Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
FAQ
Is FundedNext Futures better than Topstep?
FundedNext Futures leads by PropScore (90 vs 81). FundedNext Futures wins on Activation fee. Topstep wins on Entry price, Profit split, Drawdown. Ties are left unmarked.
Which is cheaper, FundedNext Futures or Topstep?
Topstep is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $198 · 50K vs $299 · 50K.
Which has the stronger Health Score?
Their current Health Score is tied or unavailable: n/a vs 74.
Related comparisons