How the instrument works
The full specification of the PropScore โ every criterion, every weight, every rule. Built to be argued with: if you disagree with a weighting, you can see exactly what to disagree with.
Methodology v2.3 ยท last amended 2026-05-12 ยท Affiliate relationships never change the calculation โ full disclosure in the footer.
Editorial assessment covers payout evidence, rule clarity, support, platform experience, execution fit and edge cases. Individual criterion assessments are not currently published for every firm.
Payout reliability, Trustpilot quality weighted by volume and recency, community sentiment, operational stability.
Best price (50K) ยท $25Kโ$75K ยท $20โ$500
Maximum trader share offered across plans. Higher share, higher score.
Fewer required days = faster path to payout, based on the most flexible available plan.
Recorded data feeds ยท 0โ2
Realistic parallel scaling potential โ how many accounts one trader can actually run.
Lucid TradingThe example and published score differ. Score displayed on the firm page: 83/100. Verification is in progress; the published score has not been changed.
Existing calculation: price uses the cheapest recorded 25Kโ75K plan, normalized from $20 to $500; split uses 70โ100%; minimum days uses 0โ30; recorded data feeds reach full points at 2, accounts at 20. Missing Health and editorial inputs default to 40/100 and 50/100; missing plan inputs and feeds receive zero for those criteria. Defaults are not verified observations. If both Health and editorial inputs are at most 10/100, the final score is capped at 10/100.
A firm can have the best pricing and split on the market โ a weak Health Score still drags the final PropScore down. That asymmetry is deliberate. Lucid's current Health component is 69/100.
Head-to-head pages mark a metric winner only when the result is calculable from the database. Ties are left unmarked. These rules are mechanical: price lower wins; profit split higher wins; activation fee lower wins; payout speed lower days wins; max accounts higher wins; Health Score higher wins; minimum trading days lower wins.
Drawdown is ranked static/EOD choice above static, static above EOD, and EOD above trailing. Data feeds and platforms are ranked by supported major platform count. Bots and micro-scalping are ranked by explicit permission flags. No affiliate relationship, manual preference or sponsored placement can add a winner marker.
Every amendment is logged here with its date. Scores are versioned against the methodology that produced them.
Can firms pay to improve their score?
No. PropScore is calculated from data and structured review inputs. Affiliate relationships fund the platform and have zero impact on scores or ranking positions โ a firm with no affiliate program ranks exactly as its data says.
How often do scores update?
The pipeline recalculates every score daily from current firm data โ pricing, splits, rules, Health Score and data quality โ and every page displays its last-refresh timestamp. When a firm changes its rulebook, the ranking follows the same day.
Why is Editorial & Data Quality the largest component?
Editorial assessment covers payout evidence, rule clarity, support, platform experience, execution fit and edge cases. Individual criterion assessments are not currently published for every firm.
Do trader reviews affect the PropScore?
Reviews submitted on PropScorer are separate from scoring. External review signals may influence the Health Score and therefore the PropScore indirectly.
What about crypto prop firms?
Crypto rankings are separate. The same framework uses adapted weights: feeds 9 points and accounts 0, versus 5 and 4 for futures.
See the instrument in action โ all 58 firms, scored with exactly this method, refreshed today.
View live rankings โ