PropScorer / Compare / Bulenox vs Topstep
Bulenox vs Topstep
77
Bulenox
81
Topstep Compared on live data · as of Oct 24, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: Topstep leads by PropScore (81 vs 77). Bulenox wins on Activation fee, Data feeds, Max accounts. Topstep wins on Entry price, Drawdown, Payout speed. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
Bulenox
Metric
Topstep
$273 · 50K
Entry price
$198 · 50K✓
90%
Profit split
90%
trailing
Drawdown
eod✓
✓$148
Activation fee
$149
1000 days
Payout speed
1 days✓
✓Rithmic
Data feeds
TopstepX + Quantower
✓11
Max accounts
5
After 3 payouts
Move to live
After review payouts
✓Allowed / Allowed
Bots / micro-scalping
Not listed / Not listed
65
Health score
74✓
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you
Choose Bulenox if…
- You prefer its edge on activation fee.
- Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
- You care about parallel account scaling.
- You prefer its edge on bots / micro-scalping.
Choose Topstep if…
- You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
- You prefer its edge on drawdown.
- You prioritize the faster path to first payout.
- You want the stronger current trust profile.
FAQ
Is Bulenox better than Topstep?
Topstep leads by PropScore (81 vs 77). Bulenox wins on Activation fee, Data feeds, Max accounts. Topstep wins on Entry price, Drawdown, Payout speed. Ties are left unmarked.
Which is cheaper, Bulenox or Topstep?
Topstep is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $198 · 50K vs $273 · 50K.
Which has the stronger Health Score?
Topstep has the stronger current Health Score: 74 vs 65.
Related comparisons