PropScorer / Compare / FundedNext Futures vs Topstep
FundedNext Futures vs Topstep
82
FundedNext Futures
78
Topstep Compared on live data · as of Aug 23, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: FundedNext Futures leads by PropScore (82 vs 78). FundedNext Futures wins on Entry price, Activation fee, Data feeds. Topstep wins on Profit split, Health score. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
FundedNext Futures
Metric
Topstep
✓$89.99 · 50K
Entry price
$198 · 50K
80%
Profit split
90%✓
eod
Drawdown
eod
✓$0
Activation fee
$149
1 days
Payout speed
1 days
✓Tradovate + Rithmic
Data feeds
TopstepX + Quantower
✓6
Max accounts
5
After review payouts
Move to live
After review payouts
✓Allowed / Not listed
Bots / micro-scalping
Not listed / Not listed
72
Health score
74✓
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you
Choose FundedNext Futures if…
- You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
- You prefer its edge on activation fee.
- Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
- You care about parallel account scaling.
Choose Topstep if…
- You want the stronger profit split in the current plan data.
- You want the stronger current trust profile.
- You already know Topstep's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
- You already know Topstep's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
FAQ
Is FundedNext Futures better than Topstep?
FundedNext Futures leads by PropScore (82 vs 78). FundedNext Futures wins on Entry price, Activation fee, Data feeds. Topstep wins on Profit split, Health score. Ties are left unmarked.
Which is cheaper, FundedNext Futures or Topstep?
FundedNext Futures is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $89.99 · 50K vs $198 · 50K.
Which has the stronger Health Score?
Topstep has the stronger current Health Score: 74 vs 72.
Related comparisons