PropScorer Logo
PropScorer
Head-to-head comparison

Aqua Futures vs Phidias Propfirm

Two futures prop firms compared on pricing, challenge rules, funded-account terms, and trust, using live PropScorer data.

Aqua Futures vs Phidias Propfirm is a strong decision-stage comparison. On current PropScorer data, Aqua Futures is the stronger overall pick, Aqua Futures is the cheaper way to start, and Phidias Propfirm has the cleaner rules angle for some traders.

Last updated: April 8, 2026, data refreshed daily

Aqua Futures logo
Aqua Futures
Est. 2024 ยท Volumetrica
66
PropScore
Trustpilot 3.1 ยท Health 49
60% off with EASTER
View full profile โ†’
VS
Phidias Propfirm logo
Phidias Propfirm
Est. 2024 ยท Rithmic
66
PropScore
Trustpilot 3.8 ยท Health 55
No live promo right now
View full profile โ†’
Aqua Futures leads overall with a PropScore of 66/100. The starting-cost gap on the reference plan is $172.60. Aqua Futures wins on the broad data set, but category winners below show where Phidias Propfirm still has an edge.
Best on price
๐Ÿ† Aqua Futures

Aqua Futures has the lower start cost on the reference Instant 50K Standard.

Best for scaling
๐Ÿ† Phidias Propfirm

Phidias Propfirm allows more simultaneous accounts, which matters if you stack evaluations or funded accounts.

Best trust profile
๐Ÿ† Phidias Propfirm

Higher Health Score plus current review data gives Phidias Propfirm the edge on reliability.

Best payout entry
๐Ÿ† Phidias Propfirm

Lower minimum payout threshold makes Phidias Propfirm easier to monetize earlier.

Pricing, 50K-style plans

MetricAqua FuturesPhidias Propfirm
50K plan price$40$63.60
Activation fee$0$149
Cost to start$40$212.60
Best promo60% off (EASTER)None active

Challenge rules

MetricAqua FuturesPhidias Propfirm
Profit target$3,000$4,000
Max drawdown$2,000$2,500
Drawdown typeTrailingEnd-of-Day
Min trading days00
One-day passNoNo
Max accounts510
PlatformsVolumetricaRithmic

Funded-account terms

MetricAqua FuturesPhidias Propfirm
Profit split80%80%
Min payoutN/A$1,000
Max early payoutN/AN/A
Daily loss limit ruleNoNo
Max total funded$500,000$1,500,000

Trust and reputation

MetricAqua FuturesPhidias Propfirm
PropScore66/10066/100
Health Score49/10055/100
Trustpilot3.1/53.8/5
Founded20242024

Our take

Aqua Futures and Phidias Propfirm are unusually close overall, so the decision comes down to rules and trading style.

Aqua Futures is strongest for traders who care most about its pricing structure, its broader platform stack, and a current PropScore of 66/100.

Phidias Propfirm is strongest for traders who care most about end-of-day drawdown structure, fewer funded-account restrictions, and a current PropScore of 66/100.

In plain English, pick Aqua Futures if you want the stronger overall package today. Pick the other one only if its specific rule advantage matches your exact trading style better than the raw overall score does.

Quick verdict

Best on price
Aqua Futures
Best for scaling
Phidias Propfirm
Best trust profile
Phidias Propfirm
Best default pick
Aqua Futures

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Aqua Futures or Phidias Propfirm?

Aqua Futures starts at $40, while Phidias Propfirm starts at $63.60 plus a $149 activation fee.

Which firm has the higher PropScore?

Aqua Futures currently leads with a PropScore of 66/100.

Which firm is better for scaling multiple accounts?

Phidias Propfirm allows more accounts (10 vs 5).

Who should pick which firm?

Best overall
Aqua Futures

Pick Aqua Futures if you want the strongest all-around mix of score, reliability, and trader value.

Best lower-cost option
Aqua Futures

Pick Aqua Futures if your main goal is minimizing the cost to get started.

Best rules angle
Phidias Propfirm

Pick Phidias Propfirm if the account structure and funded rules fit your trading style better.

Aqua Futures
60% off with EASTER
View full profile โ†’
Phidias Propfirm
See full profile and live pricing
View full profile โ†’

More comparisons

Keep comparing nearby alternatives if you are still deciding between Aqua Futures, Phidias Propfirm, and similar firms.