Zenit Funding Review
Zenit Funding review: editorial verdict
Zenit Funding is a futures prop firm profile with a calculated PropScore of 60/100 and a Health Score of 51/100 in the live app data. Founded year is 2024, headquarters are Europe, and the current firm status is active. The profile should be read as a data-led review, not a marketing verdict: Trustpilot 4/5 from 37 reviews. The tracked offer covers Evaluation with 3 plans in the database, and the cheapest tracked entry is $50.
The plan table shows account sizes from $50,000 to $300,000, with headline profit split at 90%. Pricing is materially plan-dependent: the cheapest visible plan is 50K Challenge at $165 list price and $50 tracked promo or sale price. Activation fee is not shown on the tracked plans, and the subscription model on the firm profile is subscription. Profit targets and max loss fields should be checked per plan because the database does not always normalize them into a single firm-level number.
Risk rules are the main fit question. The tracked drawdown type is trailing; funded drawdown is not available where populated. Minimum trading days are 2, one-day pass is not available, and the firm-level funded Daily Loss Limit flag is false. Consistency rule data is not available on the tracked plans, so traders should review the individual plan row before treating the rulebook as uniform.
Platform coverage is ATAS, Quantower, Deepcharts, with data feeds listed as dxFeed. That matters as much as price: a strong offer can still be unusable if your workflow needs a different execution stack. The instruments field in the app is ["NQ","ES","MNQ","MES","YM","RTY","CL","GC"], and the default platform is not available. Platform or data-feed gaps are stated plainly here rather than filled in from outside assumptions.
Payout evidence is mixed and should be weighted carefully. The firm-level flags say transparent payouts are not available, payout feed is not available, and community proofs are not available. No firm-level payout rows are available in the queried payout table for this slug. Payout methods are not available, daily payouts are not available, minimum days to payout are not available, and payout speed is not available day(s) where populated.
Rule permissions are incomplete in several profiles, so the safest read is narrow. DCA is allowed, bots are not available, micro-scalping is not available, VPN use is not available, hedging is not allowed, and business trading is not allowed. News trading is marked allowed in evaluation and allowed when funded.
No active alerts remain. Historical alerts in the table include Trustpilot score drop detected; Payout transparency concerns. The editorial takeaway is therefore conservative: Relatively small and new firm but they are serious and they pay. The Health Score of 51 is the best single counterweight to the headline PropScore because it captures age, review base, alerts, and trust signals. For this review, the firm is best treated as a watch-list profile where terms may be interesting but external proof is still thin.
For comparison work, the most useful read is not whether Zenit Funding has one attractive headline number, but whether the whole profile is complete enough to trust. The current plan data spans $50,000 to $300,000 accounts, target profit values from $3,000 to $20,000, and max total loss values from $2,500 to $7,500. Promo-code rows are present in Supabase (1 row), but this review only relies on plan-level sale or best-promo prices unless the exact public code is visible on the firm profile. The review base is 37 Trustpilot reviews, founded year is 2024, and the app has 0 active alert count on the firm row. That combination is why the review should foreground data completeness: missing payout methods, missing permission fields, or a narrow platform stack are not automatic red flags, but they reduce confidence until the firm publishes cleaner terms. The practical buyer test is simple: compare the lowest effective entry price with drawdown type, payout proof, review depth, and platform fit before ranking the firm against better documented alternatives. That is especially important for newer futures brands where public proof can lag product design.
Best fit
Best suited profile is covered in the editorial review below.
Not ideal for
Avoid if the trade-offs described in the editorial conflict with your strategy.
PropScore
#11 overall: selective profile, with the final score reflecting price, split, trust, payout-proof quality, rule clarity, and platform fit.
FAQ
Is Zenit Funding legit?
Zenit Funding is listed as active in the live PropScorer firm table. Founded year is 2024, Health Score is 51/100, and Trustpilot 4/5 from 37 reviews. Legitimacy should be judged from those signals plus payout proof: transparent payouts are not available and community proofs are not available in the app data.
What is the PropScore for Zenit Funding?
The current calculated PropScore in the app data is 60/100. The raw firm score field is 6, and Health Score is 51/100. Read those together: PropScore reflects plan value and available data, while Health Score is the stronger warning light for firm age, reviews, alerts, and trust depth. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
How much do Zenit Funding plans cost?
The tracked plans show a cheapest visible entry of $50. List prices in this batch range from $165 to $659. The lowest tracked plan is 50K Challenge at $165, with $50 as sale or promo data. Activation fee is not shown on tracked plans. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
What account sizes and profit split are available?
The database shows account sizes from $50,000 to $300,000. Profit split is 90% across the tracked plans. Maximum accounts at the firm level are 3. If the firm also advertises scaling, live transition, or instant funding, use the exact plan terms because the database may separate evaluation, instant, and funded rules.
What drawdown rules does Zenit Funding use?
Tracked drawdown type is trailing. Funded drawdown type is not available where the plan table has it. The firm-level funded Daily Loss Limit flag is false. Because drawdown is often the rule that decides pass/fail, check the exact plan before comparing price alone. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
Which platforms and feeds does Zenit Funding support?
Zenit Funding lists trading platforms as ATAS, Quantower, Deepcharts. Data feeds are dxFeed. Default platform is not available. If your workflow requires TradingView, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate, ATAS, Quantower, or a specific feed, rely on those populated fields and do not assume unsupported platforms are available. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
How do payouts work at Zenit Funding?
Payout methods are not available, daily payouts are not available, and minimum days to payout are not available. The profile says payout feed is not available and transparent payouts are not available. No firm-level payout rows are available in the queried payout table for this slug. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
Are there alerts or rule concerns for Zenit Funding?
No active alerts remain. Historical alerts in the table include Trustpilot score drop detected; Payout transparency concerns. Also note the missing-data fields: DCA is allowed, bots are not available, and micro-scalping is not available. Missing permissions should be treated as unknown, not as approval. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.