YRM Prop Review
Our verdict on YRM Prop
YRM Prop is a futures prop firm profile with a calculated PropScore 68/100 and a Health Score 65/100 in the live app data. Founded year is 2025, headquarters are New York, United States, and the current firm status is active. The profile should be read as a data-led review, not a marketing verdict: Trustpilot data is not available in the app data. The tracked offer covers Evaluation, Instant Funding with 8 plans in the database, and the cheapest tracked entry is $59.
The plan table shows account sizes from $25,000 to $150,000, with headline profit split at 90%. Pricing is materially plan-dependent: the cheapest visible plan is Starter Challenge 25K at $99 list price and $59 tracked promo or sale price. Activation fee is not shown on the tracked plans, and the subscription model on the firm profile is one_time. Profit targets and max loss fields should be checked per plan because the database does not always normalize them into a single firm-level number.
Risk rules are the main fit question. The tracked drawdown type is eod; funded drawdown is eod where populated. Minimum trading days are 0, one-day pass is not available, and the firm-level funded Daily Loss Limit flag is false. Consistency rule data is present on at least one tracked plan, so traders should review the individual plan row before treating the rulebook as uniform.
Platform coverage is Quantower, ATAS, TradeSea (coming soon), VolBook, with data feeds listed as dxFeed, Volumetrica. That matters as much as price: a strong offer can still be unusable if your workflow needs a different execution stack. The instruments field in the app is ["NQ","ES","MNQ","MES","YM","MYM","RTY","M2K","CL","MCL","GC","MGC"], and the default platform is Quantower. Platform or data-feed gaps are stated plainly here rather than filled in from outside assumptions.
Payout evidence is mixed and should be weighted carefully. The firm-level flags say transparent payouts are available, payout feed is available via Discord official payouts / Payout Junction references, and community proofs are present. No firm-level payout rows are available in the queried payout table for this slug. Payout methods are Rise, daily payouts are available, minimum days to payout are 6, and payout speed is 1 day(s) where populated.
Rule permissions are incomplete in several profiles, so the safest read is narrow. DCA is not available, bots are not available, micro-scalping is not available, VPN use is not available, hedging is not available, and business trading is not available. News trading is marked allowed in evaluation and allowed when funded.
Active alerts: New firm with limited reviews. Historical alerts in the table include New firm with limited reviews. The editorial takeaway is therefore conservative: YRM Prop is worth listing because the public product is unusually complete for a 2025 futures newcomer: cheap Starter challenges, Instant Prime, EOD drawdown, payout-cap tables, visible team, and active community channels. The tradeoff is trust maturity. Treat it as a promising, low-cost challenger to monitor closely rather than a blue-chip default until payout history and review volume compound. The Health Score of 71 is the best single counterweight to the headline PropScore because it captures age, review base, alerts, and trust signals. For this review, the firm is best treated as a monitorable contender with comparatively stronger health data.
For comparison work, the most useful read is not whether YRM Prop has one attractive headline number, but whether the whole profile is complete enough to trust. The current plan data spans $25,000 to $150,000 accounts, target profit values from $1,500 to $9,000, and max total loss values from $1,000 to $6,000. Promo-code rows are present in Supabase (1 row), but this review only relies on plan-level sale or best-promo prices unless the exact public code is visible on the firm profile. The review base is no usable Trustpilot review count, founded year is 2025, and the app has 0 active alert count on the firm row. That combination is why the review should foreground data completeness: missing payout methods, missing permission fields, or a narrow platform stack are not automatic red flags, but they reduce confidence until the firm publishes cleaner terms. The practical buyer test is simple: compare the lowest effective entry price with drawdown type, payout proof, review depth, and platform fit before ranking the firm against better documented alternatives. That is especially important for newer futures brands where public proof can lag product design.
Best fit
Best suited profile is covered in the editorial review below.
Not ideal for
Avoid if the trade-offs described in the editorial conflict with your strategy.
PropScore
#14 overall: competitive profile, with the final score reflecting price, split, trust, payout-proof quality, rule clarity, and platform fit.
FAQ
Is YRM Prop legit?
YRM Prop is listed as active in the live PropScorer firm table. Founded year is 2025, Health Score is 71/100, and Trustpilot data is not available in the app data. Legitimacy should be judged from those signals plus payout proof: transparent payouts are available and community proofs are present in the app data.
What is the PropScore for YRM Prop?
The current calculated PropScore in the app data is 67/100. The raw firm score field is 6.7, and Health Score is 71/100. Read those together: PropScore reflects plan value and available data, while Health Score is the stronger warning light for firm age, reviews, alerts, and trust depth. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
How much do YRM Prop plans cost?
The tracked plans show a cheapest visible entry of $59. List prices in this batch range from $99 to $899. The lowest tracked plan is Starter Challenge 25K at $99, with $59 as sale or promo data. Activation fee is not shown on tracked plans. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
What account sizes and profit split are available?
The database shows account sizes from $25,000 to $150,000. Profit split is 90% across the tracked plans. Maximum accounts at the firm level are 3. If the firm also advertises scaling, live transition, or instant funding, use the exact plan terms because the database may separate evaluation, instant, and funded rules.
What drawdown rules does YRM Prop use?
Tracked drawdown type is eod. Funded drawdown type is eod where the plan table has it. The firm-level funded Daily Loss Limit flag is false. Because drawdown is often the rule that decides pass/fail, check the exact plan before comparing price alone. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
Which platforms and feeds does YRM Prop support?
YRM Prop lists trading platforms as Quantower, ATAS, TradeSea (coming soon), VolBook. Data feeds are dxFeed, Volumetrica. Default platform is Quantower. If your workflow requires TradingView, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate, ATAS, Quantower, or a specific feed, rely on those populated fields and do not assume unsupported platforms are available. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
How do payouts work at YRM Prop?
Payout methods are Rise, daily payouts are available, and minimum days to payout are 6. The profile says payout feed is available and transparent payouts are available. No firm-level payout rows are available in the queried payout table for this slug. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.
Are there alerts or rule concerns for YRM Prop?
Active alerts: New firm with limited reviews. Historical alerts in the table include New firm with limited reviews. Also note the missing-data fields: DCA is not available, bots are not available, and micro-scalping is not available. Missing permissions should be treated as unknown, not as approval. This is a data-first review, so any blank field is intentionally described as not available rather than inferred from marketing copy or peer firms.