OneUp Trader Review
OneUp Trader review: editorial verdict
OneUp Trader is a futures prop firm in the current PropScorer database with a PropScore of 65/100 and a Health Score of 57/100. Its status is active, the founded year is not available, and Trustpilot is 4.5/5 from 2,582 reviews. The core database description says: Established funded trader program with 1-step evaluation and free 7-day trial. 25K to 250K accounts, 90% profit split, free NinjaTrader license and market data. No daily loss limit.
The offer is best read through the plan table rather than the headline marketing. The cheapest recorded plan is $25,000 at $65 for $25,000 in notional account size. The largest recorded account is $250,000 at $325 for $250,000. Profit split data shows 90%. Minimum trading days are recorded as 0, and the evaluation consistency rule is not available. Activation fees are $0, so the purchase cost may differ from the challenge price.
Evaluation drawdown in the plan data is trailing; funded drawdown is not available. The practical takeaway is that drawdown type should be checked before buying, especially for intraday futures strategies where trailing loss limits can behave very differently from EOD or static limits. The app record lists these pros: Excellent Trustpilot rating (4.5/5 from 2,575 reviews), No activation fee, No consistency rule, News trading allowed in funded phase. Listed cons are: No verified payout data yet, Trailing drawdown only.
Profit split data in Supabase shows 90% across the available plans, with max account count recorded as 5. OneUp Trader does not have a firm-level one-day-pass flag in the row, although plan-level minimum days may still be low. News trading in funded accounts is recorded as allowed.
Platform coverage matters here because futures traders often have a fixed workflow. The current record lists platforms as NinjaTrader, ATAS, Quantower, R Trader Pro and data feeds as Rithmic. Default platform is not available, MNQ round-turn fee data is not available, and subscription model is subscription.
Payout methods are not available. PropScorer does not currently mark a verified payout feed as available. Daily payouts are not marked in the plan data. Specific payout conditions are not available. The firm-level minimum days to payout is not available, payout speed days is not available, and transparent payouts is false. Where the database lacks a method or feed, this review states that plainly instead of filling gaps from memory.
There are no active PropScorer alerts in the current Supabase record. Reading the scores, OneUp Trader's PropScore is calculable from the app score while the Health Score is already present in the live firm row. A high PropScore with a weaker Health Score should be treated as a terms-versus-trust trade-off; a stronger Health Score with stricter rules can be the opposite. For this firm, the current evidence supports a review that is useful but still conditional on missing fields.
Editorially, the right use case is narrow: OneUp Trader should be compared on the exact plan family you intend to trade, not on its best headline alone. The available data is strongest around published pricing, account sizes, split, drawdown labels, platforms, and Health Score. It is weaker wherever payout methods, independent payout feed coverage, founded year, or rule-change history are blank. That makes this a review snapshot rather than a final endorsement: the attractive fields are usable, but missing evidence remains part of the verdict. For publication, the remaining check is source freshness: confirm the public rulebook still matches the July 16, 2026 Supabase snapshot, especially around payout timing, consistency, and funded drawdown. If the firm has a promo-led entry price, also confirm the checkout total because a low challenge fee can be offset by activation, reset, data, or withdrawal costs. PropScorer's editorial position is deliberately conservative: cite the strong fields, expose the missing fields, and avoid turning unavailable data into implied trust. The Health Score also needs context: 57/100 is not a moral judgment on the firm, it is a quantified view of the evidence PropScorer currently has. For newer or thinner records, the review should emphasize monitoring cadence, payout proof, Trustpilot trajectory, and any future alert changes. That is especially important when the trading terms look attractive but the public operating record is still building.
Best fit
Best suited profile is covered in the editorial review below.
Not ideal for
Avoid if the trade-offs described in the editorial conflict with your strategy.
PropScore
OneUp Trader has PropScore 65/100 and Health Score 57/100. Last reviewed: July 16, 2026.
FAQ
What is OneUp Trader's PropScore?
OneUp Trader's current PropScore is 65/100 and its Health Score is 57/100. Read those together: PropScore reflects offer quality and trading terms, while Health Score weights trust signals such as age, reviews, payout transparency, complaints, and operating history. In practical terms, use the score as a screening tool, then inspect plan rules before purchase. PropScore can move when pricing, splits, rules, platform breadth, or data quality changes. Health Score can move when review volume, complaint signals, payout evidence, or transparency changes.
Is OneUp Trader established?
The founded year in the app data is not available. Trustpilot is 4.5/5 from 2582 reviews. That gives some public reputation context, but it is not the same as a long audited operating record. Where payout data is missing, PropScorer treats the trust case as incomplete rather than assuming stability.
How much do OneUp Trader plans cost?
The cheapest recorded plan is $25,000 at $65 for $25,000 in notional account size. The largest recorded account is $250,000 at $325 for $250,000. Profit split data shows 90%. Prices can change quickly when promos rotate, so this review uses the live app values available on July 16, 2026. If a checkout price differs, treat the database figure as a review snapshot and recalculate total cost with any activation or data fees.
What profit split does OneUp Trader offer?
The plan table records profit splits of 90%. Split alone should not decide the purchase: activation fees, drawdown type, consistency rules, payout caps, and the first-payout gate can change the real value of a nominally generous split. A generous split is only useful if the payout path is clear. Always read the funded account rules alongside the percentage, because consistency caps, minimum trading days, buffers, payout caps, or fees can reduce the practical value of the advertised split.
What drawdown model does OneUp Trader use?
Evaluation drawdown in the plan data is trailing; funded drawdown is not available. For futures traders, this is one of the highest-impact fields because a trailing drawdown can punish open-profit giveback differently from EOD or static models. Check the exact plan before buying, especially when a firm offers more than one route.
Which platforms and data feeds does OneUp Trader support?
The current firm record lists trading platforms as NinjaTrader, ATAS, Quantower, R Trader Pro and data feeds as Rithmic. If your workflow depends on a specific execution stack, confirm the selected plan supports it, because platform availability can vary by account family or data-feed route. The platform list is a compatibility check, not a promise that every plan supports every route. Before buying, match your required charting, order-entry, copier, and data-feed setup to the specific account type shown at checkout.
How do payouts work at OneUp Trader?
Payout methods are not available. PropScorer does not currently mark a verified payout feed as available. Daily payouts are not marked in the plan data. Specific payout conditions are not available. Where methods are blank, the safe assumption is not that payouts are unavailable, but that PropScorer does not currently have a method recorded. Missing payout-method data should be resolved from the firm rulebook before paying for an evaluation or instant account.
Are there any current alerts for OneUp Trader?
There are no active PropScorer alerts in the current Supabase record. No active alert is a useful signal, but it is not a guarantee. Alerts depend on monitored rule changes, complaints, payout delays, and transparency flags. If an alert appears later, the review should be updated before publication.