FuturesElite Review
FuturesElite review: editorial verdict
FuturesElite is a futures prop firm in the current PropScorer database with a PropScore of 59/100 and a Health Score of 69/100. Its status is active, the founded year is 2024, and Trustpilot is 4.5/5 from 306 reviews. The core database description says: New futures prop firm. Details to be confirmed.
The offer is best read through the plan table rather than the headline marketing. The cheapest recorded plan is 50K at $49 for $50,000 in notional account size. The largest recorded account is 150K at $150 for $150,000. Profit split data shows 80%. Minimum trading days are recorded as 3, and the evaluation consistency rule is not available. Activation fees are $0, so the purchase cost may differ from the challenge price.
Evaluation drawdown in the plan data is trailing; funded drawdown is not available. The practical takeaway is that drawdown type should be checked before buying, especially for intraday futures strategies where trailing loss limits can behave very differently from EOD or static limits. The app record lists these pros: Strong Trustpilot rating (4.5/5, 325 reviews), $3.2M in verified payouts, Affordable entry (from $49 with promos), No activation fee, Low minimum trading days (3 days), No consistency rule. Listed cons are: Trailing drawdown only.
Profit split data in Supabase shows 80% across the available plans, with max account count recorded as 5. FuturesElite does not have a firm-level one-day-pass flag in the row, although plan-level minimum days may still be low. News trading in funded accounts is recorded as allowed.
Platform coverage matters here because futures traders often have a fixed workflow. The current record lists platforms as Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, ATAS, Quantower, Deepcharts and data feeds as Tradovate, dxFeed. Default platform is not available, MNQ round-turn fee data is not available, and subscription model is subscription.
Payout methods are not available. PropScorer marks a payout feed as available. Daily payouts are not marked in the plan data. Specific payout conditions are not available. The firm-level minimum days to payout is not available, payout speed days is not available, and transparent payouts is false. Where the database lacks a method or feed, this review states that plainly instead of filling gaps from memory.
There are no active PropScorer alerts in the current Supabase record. Reading the scores, FuturesElite's PropScore is calculable from the app score while the Health Score is already present in the live firm row. A high PropScore with a weaker Health Score should be treated as a terms-versus-trust trade-off; a stronger Health Score with stricter rules can be the opposite. For this firm, the current evidence supports a review that is useful but still conditional on missing fields.
Editorially, the right use case is narrow: FuturesElite should be compared on the exact plan family you intend to trade, not on its best headline alone. The available data is strongest around published pricing, account sizes, split, drawdown labels, platforms, and Health Score. It is weaker wherever payout methods, independent payout feed coverage, founded year, or rule-change history are blank. That makes this a review snapshot rather than a final endorsement: the attractive fields are usable, but missing evidence remains part of the verdict. For publication, the remaining check is source freshness: confirm the public rulebook still matches the July 16, 2026 Supabase snapshot, especially around payout timing, consistency, and funded drawdown. If the firm has a promo-led entry price, also confirm the checkout total because a low challenge fee can be offset by activation, reset, data, or withdrawal costs. PropScorer's editorial position is deliberately conservative: cite the strong fields, expose the missing fields, and avoid turning unavailable data into implied trust. The Health Score also needs context: 69/100 is not a moral judgment on the firm, it is a quantified view of the evidence PropScorer currently has. For newer or thinner records, the review should emphasize monitoring cadence, payout proof, Trustpilot trajectory, and any future alert changes. That is especially important when the trading terms look attractive but the public operating record is still building.
Best fit
Best suited profile is covered in the editorial review below.
Not ideal for
Avoid if the trade-offs described in the editorial conflict with your strategy.
PropScore
FuturesElite has PropScore 59/100 and Health Score 69/100. Last reviewed: July 16, 2026.
FAQ
What is FuturesElite's PropScore?
FuturesElite's current PropScore is 59/100 and its Health Score is 69/100. Read those together: PropScore reflects offer quality and trading terms, while Health Score weights trust signals such as age, reviews, payout transparency, complaints, and operating history. In practical terms, use the score as a screening tool, then inspect plan rules before purchase. PropScore can move when pricing, splits, rules, platform breadth, or data quality changes. Health Score can move when review volume, complaint signals, payout evidence, or transparency changes.
Is FuturesElite established?
The founded year in the app data is 2024. Trustpilot is 4.5/5 from 306 reviews. That gives some public reputation context, but it is not the same as a long audited operating record. Where payout data is missing, PropScorer treats the trust case as incomplete rather than assuming stability. For trust, the important caveat is that public reviews and founded year are directional, not complete proof.
How much do FuturesElite plans cost?
The cheapest recorded plan is 50K at $49 for $50,000 in notional account size. The largest recorded account is 150K at $150 for $150,000. Profit split data shows 80%. Prices can change quickly when promos rotate, so this review uses the live app values available on July 16, 2026. If a checkout price differs, treat the database figure as a review snapshot and recalculate total cost with any activation or data fees.
What profit split does FuturesElite offer?
The plan table records profit splits of 80%. Split alone should not decide the purchase: activation fees, drawdown type, consistency rules, payout caps, and the first-payout gate can change the real value of a nominally generous split. A generous split is only useful if the payout path is clear. Always read the funded account rules alongside the percentage, because consistency caps, minimum trading days, buffers, payout caps, or fees can reduce the practical value of the advertised split.
What drawdown model does FuturesElite use?
Evaluation drawdown in the plan data is trailing; funded drawdown is not available. For futures traders, this is one of the highest-impact fields because a trailing drawdown can punish open-profit giveback differently from EOD or static models. Check the exact plan before buying, especially when a firm offers more than one route.
Which platforms and data feeds does FuturesElite support?
The current firm record lists trading platforms as Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, ATAS, Quantower, Deepcharts and data feeds as Tradovate, dxFeed. If your workflow depends on a specific execution stack, confirm the selected plan supports it, because platform availability can vary by account family or data-feed route. The platform list is a compatibility check, not a promise that every plan supports every route. Before buying, match your required charting, order-entry, copier, and data-feed setup to the specific account type shown at checkout.
How do payouts work at FuturesElite?
Payout methods are not available. PropScorer marks a payout feed as available. Daily payouts are not marked in the plan data. Specific payout conditions are not available. Where methods are blank, the safe assumption is not that payouts are unavailable, but that PropScorer does not currently have a method recorded. Missing payout-method data should be resolved from the firm rulebook before paying for an evaluation or instant account.
Are there any current alerts for FuturesElite?
There are no active PropScorer alerts in the current Supabase record. No active alert is a useful signal, but it is not a guarantee. Alerts depend on monitored rule changes, complaints, payout delays, and transparency flags. If an alert appears later, the review should be updated before publication.