PropScorer Logo
PropScorer
Comparação head-to-head

Blueberry Futures vs Zenit Funding

Duas prop firms de futuros comparadas em preço, regras do challenge, termos funded e confiança, usando dados ao vivo do PropScorer.

Blueberry Futures vs Zenit Funding é uma comparação de alta intenção. Nos dados atuais da PropScorer, Zenit Funding é a melhor escolha geral, Zenit Funding é a forma mais barata de começar e Zenit Funding tem o melhor ângulo de regras para alguns traders.

Last updated: April 8, 2026, data refreshed daily

Blueberry Futures logo
Blueberry Futures
Est. 2024 · Blackarrow
61
PropScore
Trustpilot 2.6 · Health 40
60% off with FUTURES60
View full profile →
VS
Zenit Funding logo
Zenit Funding
Est. 2024 · dxFeed
64
PropScore
Trustpilot 4.0 · Health 50
30% off with ZENIT30
View full profile →
Zenit Funding leads overall with a PropScore of 64/100. The starting-cost gap on the reference plan is $9.70. Zenit Funding wins overall, but the tables below show where Blueberry Futures still competes well.
Best on price
🏆 Zenit Funding

Zenit Funding has the lower start cost on the reference 50K Challenge.

Best for scaling
🏆 Blueberry Futures

Blueberry Futures allows more simultaneous accounts, which matters if you stack evaluations or funded accounts.

Best trust profile
🏆 Zenit Funding

Higher Health Score plus current review data gives Zenit Funding the edge on reliability.

Best payout entry
🏆 Blueberry Futures

Lower minimum payout threshold makes Blueberry Futures easier to monetize earlier.

Pricing, 50K-style plans

MetricBlueberry FuturesZenit Funding
50K plan price$59.20$49.50
Activation fee$0$0
Cost to start$59.20$49.50
Best promo60% off (FUTURES60)30% off (ZENIT30)

Challenge rules

MetricBlueberry FuturesZenit Funding
Profit target$3,000$3,000
Max drawdown$2,500$2,500
Drawdown typeTrailingTrailing
Min trading days52
One-day passNoNo
Max accounts33
PlatformsBlackarrowdxFeed

Funded-account terms

MetricBlueberry FuturesZenit Funding
Profit split80%90%
Min payoutN/AN/A
Max early payoutN/AN/A
Daily loss limit ruleNoNo
Max total funded$150,000$900,000

Trust and reputation

MetricBlueberry FuturesZenit Funding
PropScore61/10064/100
Health Score40/10050/100
Trustpilot2.6/54.0/5
Founded20242024

Nossa visão

Zenit Funding is the better default choice on PropScorer right now because it offers the stronger overall mix of price, rules, trust, and trader value.

Blueberry Futures is strongest for traders who care most about its pricing structure, its broader platform stack, and a current PropScore of 61/100.

Zenit Funding is strongest for traders who care most about its rule set, fewer funded-account restrictions, and a current PropScore of 64/100.

In plain English, pick Zenit Funding if you want the stronger overall package today. Pick the other one only if its specific rule advantage matches your exact trading style better than the raw overall score does.

Veredito rápido

Best on price
Zenit Funding
Best for scaling
Blueberry Futures
Best trust profile
Zenit Funding
Melhor escolha padrão
Zenit Funding

Perguntas frequentes

Which is cheaper, Blueberry Futures or Zenit Funding?

Blueberry Futures starts at $59.20, while Zenit Funding starts at $49.50.

Which firm has the higher PropScore?

Zenit Funding currently leads with a PropScore of 64/100.

Which firm is better for scaling multiple accounts?

Both firms currently allow up to 3 accounts.

Quem deve escolher qual firma?

Melhor no geral
Zenit Funding

Escolha Zenit Funding se você quer a melhor combinação geral de score, confiabilidade e valor para o trader.

Melhor opção barata
Zenit Funding

Escolha Zenit Funding se seu objetivo principal é reduzir o custo inicial.

Melhor ângulo de regras
Zenit Funding

Escolha Zenit Funding se a estrutura da conta e as regras funded combinam melhor com seu estilo.

Blueberry Futures
60% off with FUTURES60
View full profile →
Zenit Funding
30% off with ZENIT30
View full profile →

Mais comparações

Continue comparando alternativas próximas se ainda estiver decidindo entre Blueberry Futures, Zenit Funding e firmas parecidas.