Aqua Futures vs Fundedseat
Due prop firm futures confrontate per prezzo, regole della challenge, condizioni funded e affidabilità, usando i dati live di PropScorer.
Aqua Futures vs Fundedseat è un confronto ad alta intenzione. Con i dati attuali di PropScorer, Fundedseat è la scelta complessiva migliore, Fundedseat è il modo più economico per iniziare e Fundedseat ha l’angolo regole più pulito per alcuni trader.
Last updated: April 8, 2026, data refreshed daily
Fundedseat has the lower start cost on the reference 1-Step Daily 50K.
Aqua Futures allows more simultaneous accounts, which matters if you stack evaluations or funded accounts.
Higher Health Score plus current review data gives Fundedseat the edge on reliability.
Lower minimum payout threshold makes Aqua Futures easier to monetize earlier.
Pricing, 50K-style plans
| Metric | Aqua Futures | Fundedseat |
|---|---|---|
| 50K plan price | $40 | $21 |
| Activation fee | $0 | $0 |
| Cost to start | $40 | $21 |
| Best promo | 60% off (EASTER) | None active |
Challenge rules
| Metric | Aqua Futures | Fundedseat |
|---|---|---|
| Profit target | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| Max drawdown | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| Drawdown type | Trailing | End-of-Day |
| Min trading days | 0 | 0 |
| One-day pass | No | No |
| Max accounts | 5 | 5 |
| Platforms | Volumetrica | Rithmic · dxFeed |
Funded-account terms
| Metric | Aqua Futures | Fundedseat |
|---|---|---|
| Profit split | 80% | 90% |
| Min payout | N/A | N/A |
| Max early payout | N/A | $1,250 |
| Daily loss limit rule | No | No |
| Max total funded | $500,000 | $250,000 |
Trust and reputation
| Metric | Aqua Futures | Fundedseat |
|---|---|---|
| PropScore | 67/100 | 71/100 |
| Health Score | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Trustpilot | 3.1/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Founded | 2024 | 2026 |
La nostra opinione
Fundedseat is the better default choice on PropScorer right now because it offers the stronger overall mix of price, rules, trust, and trader value.
Aqua Futures is strongest for traders who care most about its pricing structure, its broader platform stack, and a current PropScore of 67/100.
Fundedseat is strongest for traders who care most about end-of-day drawdown structure, fewer funded-account restrictions, and a current PropScore of 71/100.
In plain English, pick Fundedseat if you want the stronger overall package today. Pick the other one only if its specific rule advantage matches your exact trading style better than the raw overall score does.
Verdetto rapido
Domande frequenti
Which is cheaper, Aqua Futures or Fundedseat?
Aqua Futures starts at $40, while Fundedseat starts at $21.
Which firm has the higher PropScore?
Fundedseat currently leads with a PropScore of 71/100.
Which firm is better for scaling multiple accounts?
Both firms currently allow up to 5 accounts.
Quale trader dovrebbe scegliere quale firm?
Scegli Fundedseat se vuoi il miglior mix complessivo tra punteggio, affidabilità e valore per il trader.
Scegli Fundedseat se il tuo obiettivo principale è ridurre il costo iniziale.
Scegli Fundedseat se la struttura del conto e le regole funded si adattano meglio al tuo stile.
Vuoi alert se questa decisione cambia la prossima settimana?
PropScorer Pro monitora segnali di fiducia, comportamento dei payout e aggiornamenti delle regole, così non ti affidi a una fotografia momentanea quando scegli tra le firm.
Altri confronti
Continua a confrontare alternative vicine se stai ancora decidendo tra Aqua Futures, Fundedseat e firm simili.