PropScorer Logo
PropScorer
Comparación cara a cara

BluSky vs Funded Futures Network

Dos prop firms de futuros comparadas en precio, reglas del challenge, condiciones funded y confianza, usando datos en vivo de PropScorer.

BluSky vs Funded Futures Network es una comparación de alta intención. Con los datos actuales de PropScorer, BluSky es la mejor opción general, Funded Futures Network es la forma más barata de empezar y BluSky tiene el mejor ángulo de reglas para algunos traders.

Last updated: April 8, 2026, data refreshed daily

BluSky logo
BluSky
Est. 2022 · Tradovate
73
PropScore
Trustpilot 4.8 · Health 72
33% off with MADNESS
View full profile →
VS
Funded Futures Network logo
Funded Futures Network
Est. 2024 · Rithmic
63
PropScore
Trustpilot 4.5 · Health 66
40% off with SCORER
View full profile →
BluSky leads overall with a PropScore of 73/100. The starting-cost gap on the reference plan is $2.03. BluSky wins on the broad data set, but category winners below show where Funded Futures Network still has an edge.
Best on price
🏆 Funded Futures Network

Funded Futures Network has the lower start cost on the reference 50k Standard.

Best for scaling
🏆 Funded Futures Network

Funded Futures Network allows more simultaneous accounts, which matters if you stack evaluations or funded accounts.

Best trust profile
🏆 BluSky

Higher Health Score plus current review data gives BluSky the edge on reliability.

Best payout entry
🏆 Funded Futures Network

Lower minimum payout threshold makes Funded Futures Network easier to monetize earlier.

Pricing, 50K-style plans

MetricBluSkyFunded Futures Network
50K plan price$39.53$37.50
Activation fee$0$0
Cost to start$39.53$37.50
Best promo33% off (MADNESS)40% off (SCORER)

Challenge rules

MetricBluSkyFunded Futures Network
Profit target$3,000$3,000
Max drawdown$2,000$2,000
Drawdown typelaunchTrailing
Min trading days00
One-day passNoNo
Max accounts310
PlatformsTradovateRithmic

Funded-account terms

MetricBluSkyFunded Futures Network
Profit split90%80%
Min payoutN/A$500
Max early payoutN/A$10,000
Daily loss limit ruleNoNo
Max total funded$900,000$2,500,000

Trust and reputation

MetricBluSkyFunded Futures Network
PropScore73/10063/100
Health Score72/10066/100
Trustpilot4.8/54.5/5
Founded20222024

Nuestra opinión

BluSky is the better default choice on PropScorer right now because it offers the stronger overall mix of price, rules, trust, and trader value.

BluSky is strongest for traders who care most about its pricing structure, its broader platform stack, and a current PropScore of 73/100.

Funded Futures Network is strongest for traders who care most about its rule set, fewer funded-account restrictions, and a current PropScore of 63/100.

In plain English, pick BluSky if you want the stronger overall package today. Pick the other one only if its specific rule advantage matches your exact trading style better than the raw overall score does.

Veredicto rápido

Best on price
Funded Futures Network
Best for scaling
Funded Futures Network
Best trust profile
BluSky
Mejor opción por defecto
BluSky

Preguntas frecuentes

Which is cheaper, BluSky or Funded Futures Network?

BluSky starts at $39.53, while Funded Futures Network starts at $37.50.

Which firm has the higher PropScore?

BluSky currently leads with a PropScore of 73/100.

Which firm is better for scaling multiple accounts?

Funded Futures Network allows more accounts (10 vs 3).

¿Qué trader debería elegir cada firma?

Mejor opción general
BluSky

Elige BluSky si quieres la mejor mezcla global de puntuación, fiabilidad y valor para el trader.

Mejor opción barata
Funded Futures Network

Elige Funded Futures Network si tu prioridad es reducir al máximo el coste inicial.

Mejor ángulo de reglas
BluSky

Elige BluSky si la estructura de cuenta y las reglas funded se adaptan mejor a tu estilo.

BluSky
33% off with MADNESS
View full profile →
Funded Futures Network
40% off with SCORER
View full profile →

Más comparaciones

Sigue comparando alternativas cercanas si todavía dudas entre BluSky, Funded Futures Network y firmas similares.