🔥Phidias Propfirm-80%GET DEAL →1/5
PropScorer / Compare / TradeDay vs Vanta Trading

TradeDay vs Vanta Trading

TradeDay logo
76
TradeDayest. 2020 · TP 4.6 · PropScore 76
VS
Vanta Trading logo
71
Vanta Tradingest. 2026 · TP 4.6 · PropScore 71
Compared on live data · as of Aug 25, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: TradeDay leads by PropScore (76 vs 71). TradeDay wins on Entry price, Payout speed, Data feeds. Vanta Trading wins on Profit split, Drawdown, Bots / micro-scalping. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
TradeDay
Metric
Vanta Trading
$250 · 50K
Entry price
$319 · 50K
80%
Profit split
100%
eod
Drawdown
static
$0
Activation fee
$0
1 days
Payout speed
7 days
Tradovate + Rithmic
Data feeds
Hyperliquid + Databento / Massive
6
Max accounts
1
After review payouts
Move to live
No
Allowed / n/a
Bots / micro-scalping
Allowed / Allowed
77
Health score
56
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you

TradeDay logo
Choose TradeDay if…

  • You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
  • You prioritize the faster path to first payout.
  • Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
  • You care about parallel account scaling.
TradeDay full review →

Vanta Trading logo
Choose Vanta Trading if…

  • You want the stronger profit split in the current plan data.
  • You prefer its edge on drawdown.
  • You prefer its edge on bots / micro-scalping.
  • You already know Vanta Trading's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
Vanta Trading full review →
FAQ
Is TradeDay better than Vanta Trading?

TradeDay leads by PropScore (76 vs 71). TradeDay wins on Entry price, Payout speed, Data feeds. Vanta Trading wins on Profit split, Drawdown, Bots / micro-scalping. Ties are left unmarked.

Which is cheaper, TradeDay or Vanta Trading?

TradeDay is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $250 · 50K vs $319 · 50K.

Which has the stronger Health Score?

TradeDay has the stronger current Health Score: 77 vs 56.

Related comparisons