PropScorer / Compare / Funded Futures Family vs MyFundedFutures
Funded Futures Family vs MyFundedFutures

78
Funded Futures Family
83
MyFundedFutures Compared on live data · as of Jul 29, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: MyFundedFutures leads by PropScore (83 vs 78). Funded Futures Family wins on Entry price, Profit split, Drawdown. MyFundedFutures wins on Data feeds, Bots / micro-scalping, Health score. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
Funded Futures Family
Metric
MyFundedFutures
✓$89 · 50K
Entry price
$97 · 50K
✓100%
Profit split
90%
✓eod / or / trailing
Drawdown
intraday / trailing
$0
Activation fee
$0
1 days
Payout speed
1 days
WealthCharts + Tradovate + Rithmic
Data feeds
Tradovate + dxFeed✓
5
Max accounts
5
After review payouts
Move to live
After review payouts
Allowed / n/a
Bots / micro-scalping
Allowed / Not listed✓
78
Health score
79✓
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you
Choose Funded Futures Family if…

- You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
- You want the stronger profit split in the current plan data.
- You prefer its edge on drawdown.
- You already know Funded Futures Family's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
Choose MyFundedFutures if…

- Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
- You prefer its edge on bots / micro-scalping.
- You want the stronger current trust profile.
- You already know MyFundedFutures's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
FAQ
Is Funded Futures Family better than MyFundedFutures?
MyFundedFutures leads by PropScore (83 vs 78). Funded Futures Family wins on Entry price, Profit split, Drawdown. MyFundedFutures wins on Data feeds, Bots / micro-scalping, Health score. Ties are left unmarked.
Which is cheaper, Funded Futures Family or MyFundedFutures?
Funded Futures Family is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $89 · 50K vs $97 · 50K.
Which has the stronger Health Score?
MyFundedFutures has the stronger current Health Score: 79 vs 78.
Related comparisons