🔥Phidias Propfirm-85%GET DEAL →1/5
PropScorer / Compare / FTMO Futures vs Tradeify

FTMO Futures vs Tradeify

FTMO Futures logo
80
FTMO Futuresest. 2015 · TP 4.8 · PropScore 80
VS
Tradeify logo
80
Tradeifyest. 2024 · TP 4.5 · PropScore 80
Compared on live data · as of Oct 23, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: FTMO Futures and Tradeify are tied by PropScore. FTMO Futures wins on Entry price. Tradeify wins on Payout speed, Data feeds, Max accounts. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
FTMO Futures
Metric
Tradeify
✓$83.30 · 50K
Entry price
$97 · 50K
90%
Profit split
90%
eod
Drawdown
eod
$0
Activation fee
$0
20 days
Payout speed
1 days✓
Tradovate
Data feeds
Tradovate + WealthCharts + TradeSea✓
3
Max accounts
5✓
After review payouts
Move to live
After 3 payouts
Not listed / Allowed
Bots / micro-scalping
Allowed / Allowed✓
71
Health score
72✓
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you

FTMO Futures logo
Choose FTMO Futures if…

  • You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
  • You already know FTMO Futures's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
  • You already know FTMO Futures's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
  • You already know FTMO Futures's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
FTMO Futures full review →

Tradeify logo
Choose Tradeify if…

  • You prioritize the faster path to first payout.
  • Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
  • You care about parallel account scaling.
  • You prefer its edge on bots / micro-scalping.
Tradeify full review →
FAQ
Is FTMO Futures better than Tradeify?

FTMO Futures and Tradeify are tied by PropScore. FTMO Futures wins on Entry price. Tradeify wins on Payout speed, Data feeds, Max accounts. Ties are left unmarked.

Which is cheaper, FTMO Futures or Tradeify?

FTMO Futures is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $83.30 · 50K vs $97 · 50K.

Which has the stronger Health Score?

Tradeify has the stronger current Health Score: 72 vs 71.

Related comparisons