🔥DayTraders-90%GET DEAL →1/5
PropScorer / Compare / Earn2Trade vs FTMO Futures

Earn2Trade vs FTMO Futures

Earn2Trade logo
59
Earn2Tradeest. 2016 · TP 4.5 · PropScore 59
VS
FTMO Futures logo
78
FTMO Futuresest. 2015 · TP 4.8 · PropScore 78
Compared on live data · as of Sep 4, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: FTMO Futures leads by PropScore (78 vs 59). Earn2Trade wins on Payout speed, Data feeds, Max accounts. FTMO Futures wins on Entry price, Profit split, Activation fee. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
Earn2Trade
Metric
FTMO Futures
$224 · 50K
Entry price
$119 · 50K
80%
Profit split
90%
eod
Drawdown
eod
$139
Activation fee
$0
7 days
Payout speed
20 days
Rithmic
Data feeds
Tradovate
5
Max accounts
3
After review payouts
Move to live
After review payouts
Allowed / Not listed
Bots / micro-scalping
Not listed / Allowed
72
Health score
82
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you

Earn2Trade logo
Choose Earn2Trade if…

  • You prioritize the faster path to first payout.
  • Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
  • You care about parallel account scaling.
  • You already know Earn2Trade's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
Earn2Trade full review →

FTMO Futures logo
Choose FTMO Futures if…

  • You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
  • You want the stronger profit split in the current plan data.
  • You prefer its edge on activation fee.
  • You prefer its edge on bots / micro-scalping.
FTMO Futures full review →
FAQ
Is Earn2Trade better than FTMO Futures?

FTMO Futures leads by PropScore (78 vs 59). Earn2Trade wins on Payout speed, Data feeds, Max accounts. FTMO Futures wins on Entry price, Profit split, Activation fee. Ties are left unmarked.

Which is cheaper, Earn2Trade or FTMO Futures?

FTMO Futures is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $119 · 50K vs $224 · 50K.

Which has the stronger Health Score?

FTMO Futures has the stronger current Health Score: 82 vs 72.

Related comparisons