PropScorer / Compare / Bulenox vs Lucid Trading
Bulenox vs Lucid Trading
7
Bulenox
8
Lucid Trading Compared on live data · as of Jul 19, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: Lucid Trading leads by PropScore (7.6 vs 7.4). Bulenox wins on Max accounts. Lucid Trading wins on Entry price, Drawdown, Activation fee. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
Bulenox
Metric
Lucid Trading
$177.75 · 50K
Entry price
$175 · 50K✓
90%
Profit split
90%
trailing
Drawdown
eod✓
$148
Activation fee
$0✓
1000 days
Payout speed
2 days✓
Rithmic
Data feeds
Tradovate + Rithmic✓
✓11
Max accounts
5
No
Move to live
After 5 payouts✓
n/a / Allowed
Bots / micro-scalping
Allowed / Allowed✓
65
Health score
69✓
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you
Choose Bulenox if…
- You care about parallel account scaling.
- You already know Bulenox's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
- You already know Bulenox's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
- You already know Bulenox's rulebook fits your trading workflow.
Choose Lucid Trading if…
- You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
- You prefer its edge on drawdown.
- You prefer its edge on activation fee.
- You prioritize the faster path to first payout.
FAQ
Is Bulenox better than Lucid Trading?
Lucid Trading leads by PropScore (7.6 vs 7.4). Bulenox wins on Max accounts. Lucid Trading wins on Entry price, Drawdown, Activation fee. Ties are left unmarked.
Which is cheaper, Bulenox or Lucid Trading?
Lucid Trading is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $175 · 50K vs $177.75 · 50K.
Which has the stronger Health Score?
Lucid Trading has the stronger current Health Score: 69 vs 65.
Related comparisons