PropScorer / Compare / Bulenox vs For Traders
Bulenox vs For Traders
7
Bulenox
7
For Traders Compared on live data · as of Jul 19, 2026 UTC
The one-line verdict: Bulenox and For Traders are tied by PropScore. Bulenox wins on Entry price, Data feeds, Max accounts. For Traders wins on Profit split, Drawdown, Activation fee. Ties are left unmarked.
Head to head · winner per metric is computed, not editorial
Bulenox
Metric
For Traders
✓$177.75 · 50K
Entry price
$199 · 50K
90%
Profit split
100%✓
trailing
Drawdown
eod✓
$148
Activation fee
$0✓
1000 days
Payout speed
2 days✓
✓Rithmic
Data feeds
n/a
✓11
Max accounts
5
No
Move to live
No
✓n/a / Allowed
Bots / micro-scalping
Not listed / n/a
✓65
Health score
58
Ties are shown without a marker. Winner rules per metric are documented in the methodology.
Which one is for you
Choose Bulenox if…
- You care most about the lower benchmark entry cost.
- Your workflow needs broader platform or feed support.
- You care about parallel account scaling.
- You prefer its edge on bots / micro-scalping.
Choose For Traders if…
- You want the stronger profit split in the current plan data.
- You prefer its edge on drawdown.
- You prefer its edge on activation fee.
- You prioritize the faster path to first payout.
FAQ
Is Bulenox better than For Traders?
Bulenox and For Traders are tied by PropScore. Bulenox wins on Entry price, Data feeds, Max accounts. For Traders wins on Profit split, Drawdown, Activation fee. Ties are left unmarked.
Which is cheaper, Bulenox or For Traders?
Bulenox is cheaper on the current benchmark entry cost: $177.75 · 50K vs $199 · 50K.
Which has the stronger Health Score?
Bulenox has the stronger current Health Score: 65 vs 58.
Related comparisons